Chief King Proposes Trading Officer Position for IT Specialist to Enable Body Cams

Key Points

  • Police Chief King offers to swap a vacant officer position for an IT specialist to launch body cameras
  • Chair Jay Funling disputes Town Administrator's $1 million new growth forecast, suggesting $1.25 million
  • Committee debates using school "circuit breaker" reserves to prevent potential staff layoffs
  • Draft warrant articles assigned for marijuana dispensary ban reversal and expanded demolition bylaws
  • Milton faces a 10% increase in health insurance premiums for the upcoming fiscal year

Milton’s push for police body cameras took a creative fiscal turn Monday night as the Warrant Committee reviewed a proposal to fund the necessary technology without increasing the department's bottom line. Macy Lee reported that Chief King is prepared to sacrifice a vacant law enforcement position to secure a dedicated IT specialist, a move intended to manage the massive data and discovery requirements associated with camera footage. Lee told the committee that Chief King told me that he is willing to swap out one of those law enforcement officer positions for an IT person so that there won't be an increase in the budget. Committee member Larry praised the strategy, noting that the current technical demands of the department represent a real drain on the town’s central IT resources.

The committee also grappled with a discrepancy in revenue forecasts that could impact the upcoming fiscal year. While Town Administrator Nick Milano has set a conservative new growth estimate of $1 million, Committee Chair Jay Funling suggested a more aggressive figure of $1.25 million might be achievable. Funling noted that upcoming data on property taxes for utility infrastructure, such as gas pipes and utility poles, will clarify the forecast by late February. Regarding his own professional background with a local utility, Funling quipped, I work for Eversource. I don't want to put my foot in my mouth, but you can figure it out for yourself regarding how those costs eventually reach consumers.

Significant attention was paid to the school department's circuit breaker funds and their role in the ongoing $1 million budget gap. Funling clarified that these are revolving funds, not stabilization funds, meaning they are restricted to state reimbursements and must be spent within a two-year window. The state doesn't want you to build up an infinite block, Funling explained, suggesting the school currently aims to keep about $700,000 in reserve. Julia Maxwell questioned whether prioritizing these reserves over immediate needs was the right move for the district, asking, What are we missing here as a committee when we look at this and think, 'Wow, this looks like a great way to potentially avoid layoffs,' which as a school parent would certainly be my preference versus building up a nice-to-have rainy day fund account?

The discussion highlighted a delicate dance between town boards as they navigate overlapping jurisdictions. Lee Michael McLean cautioned that while the committee should offer high-level fiscal guidance, it must respect the School Committee’s authority over specific line items. Other people can get the impression that the warrant committee sometimes tells the school committee what to do, McLean said, it's really not the warrant committee telling the school committee what to do. It's just kind of understanding the impact that the budget vote will have. Brian Maguire echoed the need for transparency, stating that while the committee cannot dictate spending, if inflation is 3% and they ask for 5%, we should get reasons for it.

The town’s self-insured status also drew scrutiny following a 10% increase in health insurance premiums. Grace Story questioned the sustainability of such spikes, asking, Do we expect that every year, that kind of increase? 10% every year? Funling noted that a final figure for the trust fund will likely be settled by the end of the month. Meanwhile, the committee began assigning leads for several non-budgetary warrant articles that will face voters this spring. Ron reported that the Historical Commission is seeking to expand the definition of demolition to include substantial structural changes rather than just total destruction. Other upcoming reviews include a potential article to undo the town's ban on marijuana dispensaries and a study of the Atherton Fire Station overhaul.

Concerns regarding energy projects also surfaced as the committee looked toward Town Meeting. Brian Maguire raised questions about the current approach to municipal solar panels, asking why the town is leasing them versus buying them direct. He suggested that there should be a more robust analysis on long-term electricity savings to ensure the town eventually owns the infrastructure. The committee plans to reconvene on March 2nd, moving to a weekly schedule throughout the month to finalize recommendations for the spring warrant.