The Milton Zoning Board of Appeals cleared the way for three significant residential expansion projects during its December 11 meeting, citing unique lot constraints and personal hardships as justification for granting relief from local bylaws. The board approved variances and special permits for properties on Valentine Road, Holmes Lane, and Dyer Avenue, all in unanimous 3-0 votes.

The first application concerned 123 Valentine Road, a corner lot where homeowner Mike Crowell sought to build a three-bay accessory garage encroaching on front and side yard setbacks. Attorney Marian Mcketric argued that the property’s location along Blue Hill Avenue created an unusual hardship regarding noise and pollution. Mcketric told the board, This garage will actually shield the residential yard from the noise and fumes of Blue Hill Avenue. Crowell emphasized his desire to preserve the property’s natural landscape, noting that moving it to the other side would be detrimental to the landscape because it would require removing the lot's best trees.

Board members expressed sympathy for the constraints of the busy commuter route. Member Nicholas Gray noted, I note that this is a large percentage of intrusion for the setbacks. However, given the unique location on an insanely busy road and the placement of the trees, I understand the logic. Member Theodore Daiber questioned the utility of the three bays, to which Crowell clarified that the space would serve as a multifunctional workshop and vehicle storage area. Chair Kathleen O'Donnell also confirmed with the applicant that the driveway would be restored to its original location to better fit the house’s aesthetic. Motion Made by N. Gray to grant the requested variances for the sideyard and front yard setbacks as presented. Motion Passed (3-0-0).

The board next considered a request for 44 Holmes Lane to replace a detached garage with an attached structure featuring a connector and additional living space. Attorney Mcketric explained that the project was driven by a family medical crisis. Mrs. Roach is facing a medical diagnosis that will require family members to visit and help, making the additional space urgent, Mcketric said. Mrs. Roach addressed the board directly, stating, My diagnosis last year has been challenging, and this space is very much needed for our family.

Chair O'Donnell praised the architectural sensitivity of the project, which was designed by Rockwood Design, noting, I like the design. It's sensitive to the house. Member Daiber added, I have no hesitation. This is a real improvement to the property and clearly needed. Nicholas Gray agreed, stating, I am in favor. I can't see how this is detrimental to the public good. The planning and architectural detail provided is very helpful for the board. Motion Made by N. Gray to grant the relief requested to increase the nonconformity as presented in the plans. Motion Passed (3-0-0).

Finally, the board reviewed a "gut rehab" proposal for 112 Dyer Avenue. The applicant, Abdus Khan, sought a special permit for a 15x25 rear addition, front porches, and a deck. Attorney Derek Small noted that Mr. Khan has a growing family and needs the extra living space, while ensuring the board that the addition would maintain a 35-foot rear setback. During the discussion, Nicholas Gray questioned if the new front porches would encroach further toward the street, but Small clarified they would remain within the existing footprint.

The board found the project consistent with the neighborhood's character. Theodore Daiber remarked, I know the neighborhood well. It's hard to modify these houses without coming to the board. I appreciate the plan being sensitive to the scope of the neighborhood. Chair O'Donnell concluded that staying within existing non-conformities on the front and sides while leaving 35 feet in the back is a good approach. Motion Made by T. Daiber to approve the special permit and granting of relief as requested. Motion Passed (3-0-0).